Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: System Administrator: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"
• Previous message: der Mouse: "Re: set group id on directories"
• In reply to: System Administrator: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"
• Next in thread: Timothy Newsham: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"

> 
> > > Modifying running kernels isn't all that hard.
> > Doesnt 'how hard it is' depend on the modifications you're making?
> > 
> On a typical BSD kernel finding suser() and altering the logic at that one
> critical point is not hard. I've not tried sys5.4 and some BSD variants seem
> to have it inlined now so its a bitch to do.

Yep hacking suser()'s idea of root's uid is an example of a trivial
modification, thats trivial to do.  What the other guy was on about - loading
new (non-loadable, obviously) modules into a running kernel is distinctly
non-trivial in comparison; hence my point that it depends on the mods you're
making.  Thats whay Im interested to hear the two ways.
-- 
------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Mailed using ELM on FreeBSD               |                    Karl Strickland
PGP 2.3a Public Key Available.            | Internet: karl@bagpuss.demon.co.uk
                                          |

• Next message: System Administrator: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"
• Previous message: der Mouse: "Re: set group id on directories"
• In reply to: System Administrator: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"
• Next in thread: Timothy Newsham: "Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers"